| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Daoi Sith
Gallente Blueprint Haus Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 07:28:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Daoi Sith on 05/02/2009 07:29:12 i agree. the mechanic should be changed to a vote system or whatever makes sense.
however, the button has been there for ??years??
why didnt anyone notice or care before it was bob that got pwned ?
"The executor of an Alliance is given the authority to act on behalf of the Alliance in all matters. This authority is subject to review by the Alliance council. The limitation to a single executor simplifies the operation of the Alliance system, however it also places a great deal of responsibility on the member corporations to oversee the actions of the executor. At present there is no formal alliance-wide voting system on Alliance actions and policies in place, and while this is in development the use of a single executor corporation offers a suitable workaround when combined with the Declaration of Executor Support."
Alliances |

Daoi Sith
Gallente Blueprint Haus Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 07:37:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Tokenda Bong
Originally by: Daoi Sith Edited by: Daoi Sith on 05/02/2009 07:29:12 i agree. the mechanic should be changed to a vote system or whatever makes sense.
however, the button has been there for ??years??
why didnt anyone notice or care before it was bob that got pwned ?
"The executor of an Alliance is given the authority to act on behalf of the Alliance in all matters. This authority is subject to review by the Alliance council. The limitation to a single executor simplifies the operation of the Alliance system, however it also places a great deal of responsibility on the member corporations to oversee the actions of the executor. At present there is no formal alliance-wide voting system on Alliance actions and policies in place, and while this is in development the use of a single executor corporation offers a suitable workaround when combined with the Declaration of Executor Support."
Alliances
FYI BoB isnt the first victim of this. Can anyone spell "LV" or dozen other acronyms.
which kind of proves the point that it was lax security, not metagaming or exploits.
it was KNOWN that it could be done easily. so be extra careful with those directorships.
all the claims of metagaming, exploits, etc is so much BS.
EvE is harsh. you take away the harshness, you lose what makes it so renowned and so different from other games.
|

Daoi Sith
Gallente Blueprint Haus Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 15:05:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Trojanman190 The disband should have been a thing that took 24 hours to go into effect... the fact that it happened instantly is a broken aspect of the game that needs to be looked into. To disband an alliance at least half of the members should have to agree to it.
All a corp should be able to do instantly is leave.
yeah. it should have been changed back when it happened to other alliances. why now the importance ?
|
| |
|